1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Citroen C2
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C2. (58 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1154 kg more than 2003 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | 62 | C2 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 58 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 69 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 936 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 41 L |