1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2490 mm |