1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Jaguar R-D6
To start off, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (230 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 590 kg more than 2003 Jaguar R-D6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Jaguar R-D6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | R-D6 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2720 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 88 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2160 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 69 L |
