1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Lexus RX
To start off, 2003 Lexus RX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lexus RX (198 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2003 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lexus |
| Model | 62 | RX |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
