1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2004 Cadillac XLR is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac XLR (320 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2004 Cadillac XLR.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | XLR |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4572 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |
