1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2004 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 514 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Chrysler Sebring | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | Sebring |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2737 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1576 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 61 L |
