1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Citroen Xsara
To start off, 2004 Citroen Xsara is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 89 more horse power than 2004 Citroen Xsara. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 853 kg more than 2004 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Citroen Xsara | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | 62 | Xsara |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 82 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1237 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 54 L |
