1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Discovery (217 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Discovery should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Land Rover Discovery | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | 62 | Discovery |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4556 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 217 HP |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 93 L |
