1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2004 Mazda MPV is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MPV (200 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 369 kg more than 2004 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mazda MPV | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | MPV |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 80 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1721 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |
