1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 192 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 95 L |