1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 417 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
| Model | 62 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 8276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 494 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2472 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 98 L |
