1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 328 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | E-150 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 132 L |