1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Ford F-150
To start off, 2005 Ford F-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 840 kg more than 2005 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 98 L |
