1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (141 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 639 kg more than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 101 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |