1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Land Rover Discovery is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Discovery will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Land Rover Discovery | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Discovery |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2550 mm |