1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2005 Mahindra Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2005 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2005 Mahindra Armada. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
Model | 62 | Armada |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4310 mm |