1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2005 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 224 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 2005 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2279 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 99 L |