1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 340 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 84.1 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 61 L |
