1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 605 kg more than 2006 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | Crossfire |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
