1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Ford Freestar
To start off, 2006 Ford Freestar is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Freestar (201 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Freestar should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 151 kg more than 2006 Ford Freestar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Ford Freestar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Freestar |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1939 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 98 L |
