1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Colt |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 95 L |