1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Tata Sumo
To start off, 2006 Tata Sumo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 2006 Tata Sumo. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Tata Sumo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2006 Tata Sumo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Tata Sumo | |
Make | Cadillac | Tata |
Model | 62 | Sumo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |