1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2006 Toyota Highlander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Highlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | 62 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |