1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Ford E-250
To start off, 2007 Ford E-250 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 132 L |
