1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Volvo S60
To start off, 2007 Volvo S60 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2007 Volvo S60. (168 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2007 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 589 kg more than 2007 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | S60 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1501 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |