1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Audi TT
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 755 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Audi TT | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | TT |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 92.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1335 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |