1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 275 kg more than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | 300 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 6059 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 72 L |
