1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2008 Ford Explorer is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 63 kg more than 2008 Ford Explorer.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Explorer |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 85 L |