1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2008 Ford Fusion is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Ford Fusion (221 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Ford Fusion should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 980 kg more than 2008 Ford Fusion.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Ford Fusion | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Fusion |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 221 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 66 L |
