1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XF is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XF (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 341 kg more than 2008 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | XF |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 294 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1749 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 69 L |
