1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (264 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 736 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 264 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 94 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1354 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |