1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2008 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 810 kg more than 2008 Toyota Sequoia.
Because 2008 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3110 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 100 L |
