1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2009 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac Escalade (403 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 302 kg more than 2009 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Cadillac Escalade | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | 62 | Escalade |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 6160 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 403 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1788 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 98 L |
