1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |