1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz S
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz S should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz S.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz S | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | S |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 90 L |