1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 243 kg more than 2010 Cadillac STS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | 62 | STS |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 64 L |