1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Express is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 80 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Express |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2073 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 117 L |