1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Honda Pilot
To start off, 2010 Honda Pilot is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Pilot (250 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Pilot should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 113 kg more than 2010 Honda Pilot.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Honda Pilot | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Pilot |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3471 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1977 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1994 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1847 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2774 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 79 L |