1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Kia Borrego
To start off, 2010 Kia Borrego is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Kia Borrego is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Borrego will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Kia Borrego | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Borrego |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 272 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |