1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Kia Borrego
To start off, 2010 Kia Borrego is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Borrego (337 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Borrego should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 805 kg more than 2010 Kia Borrego.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Kia Borrego | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | 62 | Borrego |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4625 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 337 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 78 L |