1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer (237 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 520 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 62 | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4572 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1491 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2634 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 55 L |
