1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. (101 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 217 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Volkswagen Caddy | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | 62 | Caddy |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 2307 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
