1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 350 kg more than 2010 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 60 L |
