1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu. (169 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4872 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 61 L |