1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2011 Lotus Elise is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2011 Lotus Elise. (189 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1178 kg more than 2011 Lotus Elise. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Lotus Elise | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | 62 | Elise |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 912 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3785 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1118 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2299 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 44 L |
