1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Toyota Avalon
To start off, 2011 Toyota Avalon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Avalon (268 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Avalon should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 470 kg more than 2011 Toyota Avalon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Toyota Avalon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Avalon |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 5019 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1486 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2819 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 70 L |
