1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Audi Q5
To start off, 2012 Audi Q5 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Audi Q5 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | Q5 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 75 L |