1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 140 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS-V.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | 62 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 68 L |