1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Ford E-150
To start off, 2012 Ford E-150 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-150 weights approximately 556 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 2611 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 132 L |
