1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 BMW X5
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Because 2013 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 2013 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | BMW |
| Model | 62 | X5 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 395 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4857 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1776 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 85 L |
